Be thoughtful when you make a promise.
Only two years ago, I wrote my most energetic piece on this blog. It began with a summary of the summer, and concluded with the anticipation and arrival of my seminary education. I will not rehash the whole post (It was written Sept. 2012 titled "My Soul Sings") but I hope that you can take the time to read where I was then, before you go further in to this post. The anticipation I had then has since grown into thankfulness in most every way save for the ability knowledge can lend to the birth of half true fictions I write in my own mind.
I began this final year with a raggedness. The summer was full of classes both as a student and a teacher. Thanks to friends who know how to do road trips and come out to see their cooped up monk I can say that I did not lose my summer to unmemorable classroom landscapes. The difficulty was not the work nor the learning. The raggedness came from the whole point of this education. Before beginning this formal degree I had already learned the importance of identifying and assessing intentions and the formation of deepening habits. Education is most definitely not benign. To go with this I have recently been reminded that knowledge is sociologically held (meaning groups of people determine their character through shared habits). Language, verbally and kinetically communicate the depth and nature of our shared knowledge. I blog, because the agreement indirectly stated by my generation is that this medium is maybe the best way to share insights without too much academic distance (I'm not good at this). The group of a local church has its own habits and implied agreements about knowledge. My raggedness comes from the realization that the group I have been working within is not the same group I had perceived it to be.
The group asks that any who desire to lead it be knowledgable. Any good group will strive to have its teachers actually knowledgable. The danger in this is that the teacher will interact with knowledge beyond the group's dogma, agreed tenets of orthodox knowledge that we use to maintain the group. I will try to be less vague. I do not limit my reading to the local group's shelves. Actually, I have read very little of the group's shelves, because most of it is just a sad reiteration of an idea that was stated more boldly centuries earlier. So, off I went weekly to march off to the fountains of knowledge not realizing that as I was marching I was leaving the domain of my small group. Curiosity, the energy behind academic and faithful research, is a gift given to the few who dare to ask questions. Curiosity is the first habit learned as one embarks on education. If you are not curious you will settle at the first nice worldview you come about on any given topic.
Imagine it this way. Three people are at the Grand Canyon. The first comes to the rim and says "Wow! I will build my ranch here" (I have to admit I would love to have a ranch on the rim...) This one immediately begins work on his building and incorporates that first view he had into the design of his home. He will always "have" this view. The second man sees the same view and decides to investigate a little more, I mean that first guy is already building and frankly he was kind of annoying with his sureness. So this second man spends a few months exploring the immediate region. He makes and breaks camp occasionally and at the end has a short list of great spots. He picks one to build on, but will still visit the old campsites for weekends and even use the opportunity to teach others how to explore productively. Finally, there is the third man. He's young like the others and just as amazed by the view as the others. His amazement impresses the image of the canyon deep into his mind. He never forgets that first view, and it is from this memory that his curiosity propels him to go down, around, up, out, and maybe beyond the canyon. He's "irresponsible" for never setting himself to the practical issues at hand, seriously who can tolerate a life of unsettledness. Look at this third one, he does not even think of build a house let alone make much of a camp! He's too curios to spend much time seeing to his own preferences. He strikes out into a wild canyon. He spends his time trying to scramble up rocks just to get another view. He gets lost. The other two see no purpose to his wandering, they say he is aimless and eventually, if he does not die out there, he'll be back thankful they had built these sturdy homes.
I am going to come back to this story.
The education we pursue is not solely to our own benefit. No education worth the pain and investment is just a checklist we need to fulfill in order to get a job. Curiosity is not invested in asking the question "Is this practical?" It is much too busy asking "What the heck is that?!" and "Does it fit with this other thing I have seen?!"
Coming near the end of my time in seminary I realize that my learning is again beginning. A chapter may again be completed, but the story continues as long as we welcome the opportunity to ask questions with boldness.
Back to the story, admitting I have lived as all three men.
Years pass and the first two men stay in touch. They do not know what has become of the third man. We know that he has been all over the place. He had more than his fair share of encounters with rattlesnakes, and mountain goats. He wears the tooth of a mountain lion he nearly lost to. His boots are long forgotten, and blueness of his shirt has faded to a grey streakiness. His stories of the canyon are many. He knowns how smell moves in the wind and uses this to advantage. He had nearly died a few times. He swam in the river below and even saw the life cycle of fish down there. He wears the canyon dust all over. For the memory of his friends he is moved to go back to them. He goes back to that first spot on the rim, scrambling up heedless of the now well tramped trail made by others. He comes to the unfamiliar clearing and sees his two companions eating lunch together and laughing about something. He hails them and they don't recognize him. Who is this that smells and wears rags? What's that around that neck. He must be....oh that's him. Wow he's changed. Meanwhile our wanderer realizes he's changed in the eyes of his friend. The question is now they recognize him will they welcome him to their table? Time in the canyon is not benign.
On a personal level I am beginning to understand this outline to be a bit of my story. I am coming closer to a settled place and I do not exactly fit in. This was the place that sent me out with the promise of reception after I decided to come back in. I cannot complete this story at the moment, because I'm not sure if my dusty self is welcome in the cleanness of my companions' settlement. Frankly I begin to wonder if I even want to be there, because the welcome was not as I expected. It's awkward these days. I hate triumphal speech these days. It seems to only drive me closer to a sense of defeat. Go ahead an wave your banners I do not want to be there to see them. I'd rather go back down into the canyons among the pine groves and raging rivers of a history you've left unexplored, untried, and untold.
October 8, 2014
June 20, 2014
Faith Desires Sight
This was my second time preaching in class. Still have some work to do with presence and voice. I very much enjoyed this opportunity and thought I would share with you my readers.
The passage is Mark 10:46-52
Apologies if the audio is poor.
May 21, 2014
Grasping for something
Better is life together.
To my seminary friends understand this is not keen academics nor does it aim to be. Any great insight stated here is not my own intellect as if I could contribute something new under the sun.
To my reader may these words bless you. They have blessed me in their writing. Thank you.
Community, organization, friendship, clique, group, congregation, and fellowship all of these and those like them encapsulate the activity of relationship. We know the ups and downs of relationships, but do we seek the root of why or what relationship is? I have written a bit already about loneliness on this blog. So, yes, to a point relationship is an answer to a great wound I and most others suffer. I recommend Henri Nouwen's The Wounded Healer for a reflection on loneliness (his shorter piece Out of Solitude is good too). Not dwelling on ground all too familiar to this author the point is that understanding the reality of loneliness in my life has moved me to pursue relationship and understand it.
Starting from the point at which I want relationship -loneliness- the question of what relationship. What is the purpose of relationship? Awareness of language comes to the fore in relationship. Body language, verbal language, cultural language. Is the other person smiling or holding pursed lips? What words does he use in his sentence? What shared realities does he allude or point to? Language is more than spelling tests and grammar. It is cultural mores, practices, and traditions. Relationship is my living in the midst of "culture language" with others through the use of verbal, bodily, and time. Stick with me.
The verbal language is straightforward. You and I share the wonderful phenomenon known as English. My Times New Roman script makes sense to my eyes because I learned their form and meaning. Same with the phonetic sounds and to boot I got the midwestern dialect with its "ain't"s and "what not"s. The verbal language is nuanced and largely inherited. Nevertheless it is somewhat malleable. Bodily language is very fluid, and yet more difficult discern than verbal language. The realization with bodily language is the limitedness of my existence. I occupy 5'4" of vertical space and this world is huge. I can express myself with a strong stance or a timid cowering. Either way I communicate a bit of myself through how I occupy space. I could stay in the midwest or I could travel. Either way I express and live in occupied space. So language is both verbal and spatial. Combine these two with the passage of time and well you have History.
Thanks for letting me run down that trail a bit. Language is more than what we speak. Relationship is language with other human beings. Notwithstanding the question of why relationship remains. Were I only a consumer than relationship would be my consuming the language of other people. To a degree this is what I do in relationship. I consume the verbal and bodily language of others when I listen to them, but what is the point if all I do is listen? Language is a constant active and passive participation. Consuming is only one aspect of that participation. Relationship is also active impact on others. To identify another as friend or enemy is to be aware of and invested in their lives. Relationship fosters my identity and the identities of others. It does not create identity, but draws identity out of loneliness. Within relationship one contributes tangibly to the drawing out of identity of another. The turn from passive consumer to active relationship is a desire born out of loneliness. The end of that desire grounded in hope if one is actually going to act on it.
Here is the why of relationship. The hope on which we actively participate in relationship is our why. Geez that took forever to get to! Thank you for reading this far.
If our hope is to no longer be lonely than a closed consumerism will result. It won't matter what occupies the place of the other with whom we relate. This is in part why the television is such a successful technology. Alone in a room silence is a constant reminder of loneliness. Add a television to that room and it might not matter what is on so long as it is on. The hope is to break the silence and thus break loneliness. Unfortunately loneliness is not broken if silence is broken. One can be lonely in the midst of thousands of people. To hope only for an alleviation of loneliness lacks the depth necessary to actually participate in relationships. As an aside I conclude that loneliness will follow me wherever I go in this state I am in. A hope in culture also seems to amount to a hope in the collective work of lonely people. That is unless the culture is grounded in a hope wholly other than itself yet intrinsic to its existence. With a wink and a nod I point to the Holy.
Our "culture language, relationship, and even our loneliness is put in the service of the Holy when our hope is grounded in the Holy.
This entry is the beginnings of a series of entries. I would like to continue writing about this and other thoughts. Feel free to comment and I will reply. Better is life together.
Blessings
To my seminary friends understand this is not keen academics nor does it aim to be. Any great insight stated here is not my own intellect as if I could contribute something new under the sun.
To my reader may these words bless you. They have blessed me in their writing. Thank you.
Community, organization, friendship, clique, group, congregation, and fellowship all of these and those like them encapsulate the activity of relationship. We know the ups and downs of relationships, but do we seek the root of why or what relationship is? I have written a bit already about loneliness on this blog. So, yes, to a point relationship is an answer to a great wound I and most others suffer. I recommend Henri Nouwen's The Wounded Healer for a reflection on loneliness (his shorter piece Out of Solitude is good too). Not dwelling on ground all too familiar to this author the point is that understanding the reality of loneliness in my life has moved me to pursue relationship and understand it.
Starting from the point at which I want relationship -loneliness- the question of what relationship. What is the purpose of relationship? Awareness of language comes to the fore in relationship. Body language, verbal language, cultural language. Is the other person smiling or holding pursed lips? What words does he use in his sentence? What shared realities does he allude or point to? Language is more than spelling tests and grammar. It is cultural mores, practices, and traditions. Relationship is my living in the midst of "culture language" with others through the use of verbal, bodily, and time. Stick with me.
The verbal language is straightforward. You and I share the wonderful phenomenon known as English. My Times New Roman script makes sense to my eyes because I learned their form and meaning. Same with the phonetic sounds and to boot I got the midwestern dialect with its "ain't"s and "what not"s. The verbal language is nuanced and largely inherited. Nevertheless it is somewhat malleable. Bodily language is very fluid, and yet more difficult discern than verbal language. The realization with bodily language is the limitedness of my existence. I occupy 5'4" of vertical space and this world is huge. I can express myself with a strong stance or a timid cowering. Either way I communicate a bit of myself through how I occupy space. I could stay in the midwest or I could travel. Either way I express and live in occupied space. So language is both verbal and spatial. Combine these two with the passage of time and well you have History.
Thanks for letting me run down that trail a bit. Language is more than what we speak. Relationship is language with other human beings. Notwithstanding the question of why relationship remains. Were I only a consumer than relationship would be my consuming the language of other people. To a degree this is what I do in relationship. I consume the verbal and bodily language of others when I listen to them, but what is the point if all I do is listen? Language is a constant active and passive participation. Consuming is only one aspect of that participation. Relationship is also active impact on others. To identify another as friend or enemy is to be aware of and invested in their lives. Relationship fosters my identity and the identities of others. It does not create identity, but draws identity out of loneliness. Within relationship one contributes tangibly to the drawing out of identity of another. The turn from passive consumer to active relationship is a desire born out of loneliness. The end of that desire grounded in hope if one is actually going to act on it.
Here is the why of relationship. The hope on which we actively participate in relationship is our why. Geez that took forever to get to! Thank you for reading this far.
If our hope is to no longer be lonely than a closed consumerism will result. It won't matter what occupies the place of the other with whom we relate. This is in part why the television is such a successful technology. Alone in a room silence is a constant reminder of loneliness. Add a television to that room and it might not matter what is on so long as it is on. The hope is to break the silence and thus break loneliness. Unfortunately loneliness is not broken if silence is broken. One can be lonely in the midst of thousands of people. To hope only for an alleviation of loneliness lacks the depth necessary to actually participate in relationships. As an aside I conclude that loneliness will follow me wherever I go in this state I am in. A hope in culture also seems to amount to a hope in the collective work of lonely people. That is unless the culture is grounded in a hope wholly other than itself yet intrinsic to its existence. With a wink and a nod I point to the Holy.
Our "culture language, relationship, and even our loneliness is put in the service of the Holy when our hope is grounded in the Holy.
This entry is the beginnings of a series of entries. I would like to continue writing about this and other thoughts. Feel free to comment and I will reply. Better is life together.
Blessings
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)